Shopping on line can be easy, simple and save you lots of money. It can also take a lot of your time, frustrate you, and result in unwanted purchases. Now the same can be said for regular high street shopping, but with the vast opportunity presented by the Internet it will pay you to spend a few minutes reading this and understanding how to better optimize your Transport Layer Security shopping experience:

1. Compare - without doubt the biggest advantage that the Transport Layer Security offers shoppers today is the ability to compare thousands of Transport Layer Security at a time. This is a great thing, but not necessarily all the time! Too much can be daunting at times so take advantage of the great comparison sites and where possible let them do the hard work for you.

2. Research - if it has been said it will be on the internet. Ignorance is no longer a justifiable reason for buying the wrong thing. Take the time to research in detail everything that you could possible want to know about

3. Testimonials - don't know anybody that has bought a Transport Layer Security? Wrong! If the Transport Layer Security is good the internet will let you know. Use the Internet as a friend and get testimonials before you buy.

4. Questions - Got a question about Transport Layer Security then search the Forums, FAQ's, Blogs etc. Don't be afraid to ask .....

5. Reputation - Never heard of the company selling Transport Layer Security? Don't worry, no reason why you should know every company in the world, but you know someone that does! Use the internet to find out what people are saying about Transport Layer Security and build up a picture of their reputation for sales, returns, customer service, delivery etc.

6. Returns - still worried that even after all of the above your Transport Layer Security wont be what you want? Check out the returns policy. There is so much competition now that someone, somewhere is bound to offer the terms that you are comfortable with.

7. Feedback - happy with your Transport Layer Security then let people know, after all you are depending on others people input in your buying decision, so why not give a little back.

8. Security - check for the yellow padlock on the Transport Layer Security site before you buy, and the s after http:/ /i.e. https:// = a secure site

9. Contact - got a question about Transport Layer Security, or want to leave a comment then check out the sites contact page. Reputable companies have them and respond.

10. Payment - ready to pay for your Transport Layer Security, then use your credit card or PayPal! Be aware of companies that don't accept them, there may be genuine reasons but given the huge amount of choice you have when buying online there is no reason at all not to buy via credit card or PayPal.



Transport Layer Security (TLS) and its predecessor, Secure Sockets Layer (SSL), are cryptographic protocols that provide security communications on the Internet for such things as web browsing, electronic mail, Internet faxing, instant messaging and other data transfers. There are slight differences between SSL and TLS, but the protocol remains substantially the same.

Description The TLS protocol allows applications to communicate across a network in a way designed to prevent eavesdropping, tampering, and message forgery. TLS provides endpoint authentication and information security over the Internet using cryptography. Typically, only the server is authenticated (i.e., its identity is ensured) while the client remains unauthenticated; this means that the end user (whether an individual or an application, such as a Web browser) can be sure with whom they are communicating. The next level of security—in which both ends of the "conversation" are sure with whom they are communicating—is known as mutual authentication. Mutual authentication requires public key infrastructure (PKI) deployment to clients unless TLS-PSK or TLS-SRP are used, which provide strong mutual authentication without needing to deploy a PKI.

TLS involves three basic phases:

  • Peer negotiation for algorithm support
  • Public key exchange and certificate-based authentication
  • Symmetric key encryption


    • During the first phase, the client and server negotiate cipher suites, which combine one cipher from each of the following:

    How it works A TLS client and server negotiate a stateful connection by using a handshaking procedure. During this handshake, the client and server agree on various parameters used to establish the connection's security.





    The client may contact the server that issued the certificate (the trusted CA as above) and confirm that the certificate is authentic before proceeding.





    This concludes the handshake and begins the secured connection, which is encrypted and decrypted with the key material until the connection closes.

    If any one of the above steps fails, the TLS handshake fails, and the connection is not created.

    TLS Handshake in Detail The TLS protocol exchanges records that encapsulate the data to be exchanged. Each record can be compressed, padded, appended with a message authentication code (MAC), or encrypted, all depending on the state of the connection. Each record has a content type field that specifies the record, a length field, and a TLS version field.

    When the connection starts, the record encapsulates another protocol, the handshake protocol, which has content type 22.

    A simple connection example follows:







    : These certificates are currently X.509, but there is also a draft specifying the use of OpenPGP based certificates.



















    TLS Record Protocol {| class="wikitable" style="text-align: center; width: 100"|-! +! width="25%"| Bits 0–7! width="25%"| 8-15! width="25%"| 16-23! width="25%"| 24–31|-! 0| Content Type| Version (MSB)| Version (LSB)| Length (MSB)|-! 32| colspan="1"| Length (LSB)| colspan="3" bgcolor="#FFDDDD"| Protocol Message(s)|-! ...| colspan="4" bgcolor="#FFDDDD"| Protocol Message (cont.)|-! ...| colspan="4" bgcolor="#FFBBBB" | MAC (optional)|-! ...| colspan="4" bgcolor="#FFEEEE" | Padding (optional)|}

    Content Type: This field identifies the Record Layer Protocol Type contained in this Record.

    {| class="wikitable"! colspan="2"| Content Types|-| 20| ChangeCipherSpec|-| 21| Alert|-| 22| Handshake|-| 23| Application|}

    Version: This field identifies the major and minor version of TLS for the contained message. For a ClientHello message, this need not be the highest version supported by the client.

    {| class="wikitable" style="width: 40%;"! colspan="3"| Versions|-! Major Version! Minor Version! Version Type|-| width="10%"| 3| width="10%"| 0| SSLv3|-| width="10%"| 3| width="10%"| 1| TLS 1.0|-| width="10%"| 3| width="10%"| 2| TLS 1.1|-| width="10%"| 3| width="10%"| 3| TLS 1.2|}

    Length: The length of Protocol message(s), not to exceed 214 bytes.Protocol message(s): One or more messages identified by the Protocol field. Note that this field may be encrypted depending on the state of the connection.MAC: A message authentication code computed over the Protocol message, with additional key material included. Note that this field may be encrypted, or not included entirely, depending on the state of the connection.

    ChangeCipherSpec Protocol {| class="wikitable" style="text-align: center;"|-! +! colspan="8" width="25%"| Bits 0–7! colspan="8" width="25%"| 8-15! colspan="8" width="25%"| 16-23! colspan="8" width="25%"| 24–31|-! 0| colspan="8" bgcolor="#FFDDDD"| 20| colspan="8" bgcolor="#FFDDDD"| Version (MSB)| colspan="8" bgcolor="#FFDDDD"| Version (LSB)| colspan="8" bgcolor="#FFDDDD"| 0|-! 32| colspan="8" bgcolor="#FFDDDD"| 1| colspan="8" | 1 (CCS protocol type)| colspan="8" ||}

    Alert Protocol {| class="wikitable" style="text-align: center; width: 100%;"|-! +! width="25%"| Bits 0–7! width="25%"| 8-15! width="25%"| 16-23! width="25%"| 24–31|-! 0| bgcolor="#FFDDDD"| 21| bgcolor="#FFDDDD"| Version (MSB)| bgcolor="#FFDDDD"| Version (LSB)| bgcolor="#FFDDDD"| 0|-! 32| bgcolor="#FFDDDD"| 2| Level| Description|}

    Level: This field identifies the level of alert.

    {| class="wikitable" style="width: 85%;"! colspan="2"| Level Types|-! Code ! Description |-| 1| Warning - connection or security may be unstable|-| 2| Fatal - connection or security may be compromised, or an unrecoverable error has occurred|}

    Description: This field identifies which type of alert is being sent.

    {| class="wikitable" style="width: 60%;"! colspan="2"| Description Types|-! Code! Description|-| 0| Close notify (warning or fatal)|-| 10| bgcolor="#FFDDDD"|Unexpected message (fatal)|-| 20| bgcolor="#FFDDDD"|Bad record MAC (fatal)|-| 21| bgcolor="#FFDDDD"|Decryption failed (fatal, TLS only)|-| 22| bgcolor="#FFDDDD"|Record overflow (fatal, TLS only)|-| 30| bgcolor="#FFDDDD"|Decompression failure (fatal)|-| 40| bgcolor="#FFDDDD"|Handshake failure (fatal)|-| 41| No certificate (SSL v3 only) (warning or fatal)|-| 42| Bad certificate (warning or fatal)|-| 43| Unsupported certificate (warning or fatal)|-| 44| Certificate revoked (warning or fatal)|-| 45| Certificate expired (warning or fatal)|-| 46| Certificate unknown (warning or fatal)|-| 47| bgcolor="#FFDDDD"|Illegal parameter (fatal)|-| 48| bgcolor="#FFDDDD"|Unknown CA (fatal, TLS only)|-| 49| bgcolor="#FFDDDD"|Access denied (fatal, TLS only)|-| 50| bgcolor="#FFDDDD"|Decode error (fatal, TLS only)|-| 51| Decrypt error (TLS only) (warning or fatal)|-| 60| bgcolor="#FFDDDD"|Export restriction (fatal, TLS only)|-| 70| bgcolor="#FFDDDD"|Protocol version (fatal, TLS only)|-| 71| bgcolor="#FFDDDD"|Insufficient security (fatal, TLS only)|-| 80| bgcolor="#FFDDDD"|Internal error (fatal, TLS only)|-| 90| bgcolor="#FFDDDD"|User cancelled (fatal, TLS only)|-| 100| No renegotiation (warning, TLS only)|}

    Handshake Protocol {| class="wikitable" style="text-align: center;"|-! +! colspan="8" width="25%"| Bits 0–7! colspan="8" width="25%"| 8-15! colspan="8" width="25%"| 16-23! colspan="8" width="25%"| 24–31|-! 0| colspan="8" bgcolor="#FFDDDD"| 22| colspan="8" bgcolor="#FFDDDD"| Version (MSB)| colspan="8" bgcolor="#FFDDDD"| Version (LSB)| colspan="8" bgcolor="#FFDDDD"| Length (MSB)|-! 32| colspan="8" bgcolor="#FFDDDD"| Length (LSB)| colspan="8" | Message type| colspan="16" | Message length|-! 64| colspan="8" | Message length (cont.)| colspan="24" | Handshake message|-! ...| colspan="8" | Handshake message| colspan="8" bgcolor="#FFDDDD" | Message type| colspan="16" bgcolor="#FFDDDD" | Message length|-! ...| colspan="8" bgcolor="#FFDDDD" | Message length| colspan="24" bgcolor="#FFDDDD" | Handshake message|}

    Message type: This field identifies the Handshake message type.

    Handshake Types are: 0 HelloRequest 1 ClientHello 2 ServerHello 11 Certificate 12 ServerKeyExchange 13 CertificateRequest 14 ServerHelloDone 15 CertificateVerify 16 ClientKeyExchange 20 Finished

    Message length: This is a 3-byte field indicating the length of the handshake data, not including the header.

    Note that multiple Handshake messages may be combined within one record.

    Application Protocol {| class="wikitable" style="text-align: center;"|-! +! colspan="8" width="25%"| Bits 0–7! colspan="8" width="25%"| 8-15! colspan="8" width="25%"| 16-23! colspan="8" width="25%"| 24–31|-! 0| colspan="8" bgcolor="#FFDDDD"| 23| colspan="8" bgcolor="#FFDDDD"| Version (MSB)| colspan="8" bgcolor="#FFDDDD"| Version (LSB)| colspan="8" bgcolor="#FFDDDD"| Length (MSB)|-! 32| colspan="8" bgcolor="#FFDDDD"| Length (LSB)| colspan="24" | Application data|-! 64| colspan="32" | Application data (cont.)|-! ...| colspan="32" bgcolor="#FFDDDD" | MAC (20B for SHA-1, 16B for MD5)|-! ...| colspan="24" bgcolor="#FFDDDD" | Variable length padding (block ciphers only)| colspan="8" bgcolor="#FFDDDD" | Padding length, (block ciphers only)(1B)|-|}

    Security TLS/SSL have a variety of security measures:



    Applications TLS runs on layers beneath application protocols such as HTTP, file transfer protocol, SMTP, Network News Transfer Protocol, and Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol and above a reliable transport protocol, Transmission Control Protocol for example. While it can add security to any protocol that uses reliable connections (such as TCP), it is most commonly used with HTTP to form HTTPS. HTTPS is used to secure World Wide Web pages for applications such as electronic commerce and Mobile asset management. SMTP is also an area in which TLS has been growing and is specified in RFC 3207. These applications use public key certificates to verify the identity of endpoints.

    An increasing number of client and server products support TLS natively, but many still lack support. As an alternative, users may wish to use standalone TLS products like Stunnel. Wrappers such as Stunnel rely on being able to obtain a TLS connection immediately, by simply connecting to a separate Computer port (software) reserved for the purpose. For example, by default the TCP port for HTTPS is 443, to distinguish it from HTTP on port 80.

    TLS can also be used to tunnel an entire network stack to create a Virtual Private Network, as is the case with OpenVPN. Many vendors now marry TLS's encryption and authentication capabilities with authorization. There has also been substantial development since the late 1990s in creating client technology outside of the browser to enable support for client/server applications. When compared against traditional IPsec VPN technologies, TLS has some inherent advantages in firewall and Network address translation traversal that make it easier to administer for large remote-access populations.

    TLS is also increasingly being used as the standard method for protecting Session Initiation Protocol application signaling. TLS can be used to provide authentication and encryption of the SIP signalling associated with VOIP (Voice over IP) and other SIP-based applications.

    History and development The SSL protocol was originally developed by Netscape Communications Corporation. Version 1.0 was never publicly released; version 2.0 was released in 1994 but "contained a number of security flaws which ultimately led to the design of SSL version 3.0", which was released in 1996 (Rescorla 2001). This later served as the basis for TLS version 1.0, an IETF standard Communications protocol first defined in RFC 2246 in January 1999. VISA (credit card), MasterCard, American Express and many leading financial institutions have endorsed SSL for commerce over the Internet.

    SSL operates in modular fashion. It is extensible by design, with support for forward and backward compatibility and negotiation between peer-to-peer.

    Early short keys Some early implementations of SSL used 40-bit encryption symmetric keys because of United States of America government restrictions on the Export of cryptography. The US government explicitly imposed a 40-bit keyspace, which was small enough to be broken by brute-force search by law enforcement agencies wishing to read the encrypted traffic, while still presenting obstacles to less-well-funded attackers. A similar limitation applied to Lotus Notes in export versions. After several years of public controversy, a series of lawsuits, and eventual US government recognition of cryptographic products with longer key sizes produced outside the US, the authorities relaxed some aspects of the export restrictions. The 40-bit key size limitation has mostly gone away, and modern implementations use 128-bit (or longer) keys for symmetric key ciphers.

    Standards The first definition of TLS appeared in:

    The current approved version is 1.1, which is specified in

    The next version is proposed:

    Other Request for commentss subsequently extended TLS, including:

    Implementation Programmers may use the OpenSSL, Network Security Services, or GnuTLS libraries for SSL/TLS functionality. Microsoft Windows includes an implementation of SSL and TLS as part of its Secure Channel package. Delphi (programming language) programmers may use a library called Indy.

    TLS 1.1 As noted above, TLS 1.1 is the current approved version of the TLS protocol. TLS 1.1 clarifies some ambiguities and adds a number of recommendations, but remains very similar to TLS 1.0. A full list of differences is provided in RFC 4346 (Section 1.1).

    Certificate providers A 2005 Netcraft survey determined that VeriSign and its acquisitions such as Thawte have a 53% share of the certificate authority market, followed by GeoTrust (25%), Comodo (12%), GoDaddy (4%) and Entrust (2%). The Netcraft Secure Server Survey (GeoTrust has since been acquired by VeriSign.)

    A more recent market share report from Security Space as of April 2007 determined that VeriSign and its acquisitions (including GeoTrust) have a 59.6% share of the certificate authority market, followed by Comodo (8.3%), GoDaddy (5.3%), DigiCert (2.1%), Entrust (1.3%) and Network Solutions (1.1%).

    CAcert.org is a community-driven certificate authority that issues free public key certificates.

    See also

    Software

    References | first = David | last = Wagner | coauthors = Schneier, Bruce | title = Analysis of the SSL 3.0 Protocol | booktitle = The Second USENIX Workshop on Electronic Commerce Proceedings | publisher = USENIX Press | month = November | year = 1996 | page s= 29–40 | url = http://www.schneier.com/paper-ssl.pdf -->



    | author = Eric Rescorla,| title = SSL and TLS: Designing and Building Secure Systems| publisher = Addison-Wesley Pub Co| location = United States| year =| pages =| isbn = 0-201-61598-3| oclc =| doi =-->



    | author = Stephen A. Thomas| title = SSL and TLS essentials securing the Web| publisher = Wiley| location = New York| year = 2000| pages =| isbn = 0-471-38354-6| oclc =| doi =-->

     

    Transport Layer Security



     
    Copyright © 2008 Hintcenter.com - All rights reserved.
    Home | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
    All Trademarks belong to their repective owners. Many aspects of this page are used under
    commercial commons license from Yahoo!